Smart locks for keyless entry replace a traditional key with options such as a keypad, fingerprint reader, or phone app. My best overall pick is the Schlage Encode Smart Wi-Fi Deadbolt for buyers who want built-in Wi-Fi and a familiar deadbolt format; the eufy Security C220 stands out for fingerprint access, while the TEEHO TE001 keeps things simpler with keypad entry. The main tradeoffs are how much setup and connectivity you want, whether your door needs a full handle set or just a deadbolt, and how many ways you want to unlock it. A lock that fits your door and daily routine matters more than a long feature list. Read on for the full comparison and guidance by buyer type.
Get furniture and decor delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Complete the kit
Key Takeaways
- Schlage Encode is the strongest all-around match for shoppers seeking a connected deadbolt with built-in Wi-Fi, while its deadbolt-only form may not suit someone replacing a complete handle set.
- TEEHO TE001 is the simpler keypad-focused pick; it avoids making fingerprint access or app connectivity the center of the decision.
- eufy Security C220 makes fingerprint entry its distinguishing feature, a useful fit for households that prefer not to remember or share keypad codes.
- The Philips 4200 Series combines a keypad deadbolt with a handle, whereas the Philips Wi-Fi deadbolt and Schlage model focus on deadbolt replacement.
- The Yamiry and Evanshow lever-handle locks pair fingerprint access with a handle format, but buyers should verify door preparation and compatibility before choosing either over a deadbolt-style option.
| Yamiry Smart Door Handle Lock with Keypad and Fingerprint Recognition |  | Best for Flexible Entry Methods | Brand: Yamiry | Model: YR01 | Unlock methods: Fingerprint, Bluetooth app, passcode, key fob, mechanical key, Alexa voice | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips 4200 Series Wi-Fi Keypad Deadbolt with Handle |  | Best for Direct Wi-Fi Access | Brand: Philips | Model: DDL242X-1HW-L | Connectivity: 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Evanshow Smart Fingerprint Door Lock with Lever Handle |  | Best for Flexible Wooden-Door Fit | Brand: Evanshow | Model: 190BT | Handle type: Lever | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| TEEHO TE001 Keyless Entry Deadbolt with Keypad, Satin Nickel |  | Best Value for Code-First Entry | Brand: TEEHO | Model: TE001 | Finish: Satin nickel | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| eufy Security C220 Smart Lock with Fingerprint Entry |  | Best Overall for Connected Keyless Entry | Brand: eufy Security | Model: T8506 | Lock type: Deadbolt | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt Lock with Keypad and Fingerprint Entry |  | Best for Flexible Entry Options | Model: DDL242X-1HW | Unlock methods: App, passcode, fingerprint, physical key, Alexa, or Google Assistant | Wi-Fi: Built-in 2.4 GHz; no hub required | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Schlage Encode Smart Wi-Fi Deadbolt with Century Trim, Matte Black |  | Best for Straightforward Remote Monitoring | Model: BE489WBCEN622 | Finish and trim: Matte Black; Century | Connectivity: Built-in Wi-Fi | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| smart locks for keyless entry | Model | Brand | Unlock methods | Connectivity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yamiry Smart Door Handle Lock | YR01 | Yamiry | Fingerprint, Bluetooth app, passcode, key fob, mechanical key, Alexa voice | Bluetooth; Wi-Fi gateway sold separately for remote control |
| Philips 4200 Series Wi-Fi Keyp | DDL242X-1HW-L | Philips | PIN code, fingerprint, app, voice assistant | 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required |
| Evanshow Smart Fingerprint Doo | 190BT | Evanshow | Fingerprint, keypad passcode, NFC card, mechanical key | — |
| TEEHO TE001 Keyless Entry Dead | TE001 | TEEHO | — | — |
| eufy Security C220 Smart Lock | T8506 | eufy Security | Fingerprint, app, keypad, physical key, Apple Watch, voice control | Built-in Wi-Fi |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt L | DDL242X-1HW | — | App, passcode, fingerprint, physical key, Alexa, or Google Assistant | — |
| Schlage Encode Smart Wi-Fi Dea | BE489WBCEN622 | — | — | Built-in Wi-Fi |
More Details on Our Top Picks
Yamiry Smart Door Handle Lock with Keypad and Fingerprint Recognition
The Yamiry stands out for households that want several ways to enter without relying on a single credential: it combines fingerprint, passcode, key fob, mechanical key, Bluetooth app, and Alexa voice access. Its reversible handle and stated 10-minute DIY installation make it a practical fit for standard wooden doors, while app tools support temporary codes for guests or rental access. Compared with the TEEHO TE001, Yamiry adds fingerprint and app-based entry, but TEEHO offers a one-time guest code that deletes itself after use and IP54 weather resistance. Yamiry’s main limitation is connectivity: remote control needs a separately sold Wi-Fi gateway, so Bluetooth alone will not provide the same off-site access as the built-in Wi-Fi on the eufy C220. I’d skip it for nonstandard door materials or buyers who need remote access out of the box.
Pros:- Six entry methods give household members and guests alternatives to a physical key.
- App access management supports temporary passcodes.
- Reversible handle is designed for left- or right-handed doors.
- DIY installation is specified at about 10 minutes without drilling.
Cons:- Remote control requires a separately sold Wi-Fi gateway.
- Compatibility is limited to standard American wooden doors and may not suit every door.
- Alexa voice access depends on setup and connectivity rather than serving as a standalone entry method.
Best for: Homeowners and short-term rental hosts with standard wooden doors who want fingerprint, fob, code, and key options in one handle lock.
Not ideal for: Buyers who need remote access without extra hardware, or who have doors outside the supported standard wooden-door fit.
- Brand:Yamiry
- Model:YR01
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, Bluetooth app, passcode, key fob, mechanical key, Alexa voice
- Connectivity:Bluetooth; Wi-Fi gateway sold separately for remote control
- Door compatibility:Standard American wooden front doors
- Hand orientation:Reversible for left- or right-handed doors
- Installation time:About 10 minutes
- Included access items:2 key fobs and 2 mechanical keys
Our verdict“Choose the Yamiry if you want a handle lock with varied entry methods for a standard wooden door and can accept buying a gateway for remote access.”
Philips 4200 Series Wi-Fi Keypad Deadbolt with Handle
The Philips 4200 is a strong fit for buyers who want remote app access without a separate hub. It connects to 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi and combines fingerprints, PINs, app control, and voice assistants, with access history and lock-status checks that help owners manage entry when they are away. Its matching handle set is included, making this a more complete door-hardware replacement than a keypad deadbolt alone. Compared with the eufy Security C220, Philips specifies a faster 0.3-second fingerprint unlock and adjustable auto-lock timing, while the C220 adds Apple Watch access and includes batteries. The Philips tradeoffs are practical: batteries are not included, auto-lock is off by default, and the lock is best kept within the recommended 33 feet of the router. I’d choose another model if the door is outside its stated thickness range or the Wi-Fi signal is weak.
Pros:- Built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi provides app-based remote control without a hub.
- Fingerprint entry is specified to unlock in 0.3 seconds.
- Supports multiple PIN types, access history, and lock-status checks.
- Matching door levers are included.
Cons:- Batteries are not included.
- Auto-lock is off by default and must be enabled by the owner.
- Wi-Fi performance depends on a 2.4 GHz network and the recommended router proximity.
Best for: Households replacing both a deadbolt and handle who want remote access, fingerprints, and access history through an app without adding a hub.
Not ideal for: Buyers with weak or distant 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, doors outside the 1-3/8 to 1-3/4 inch thickness range, or anyone who wants batteries included.
- Brand:Philips
- Model:DDL242X-1HW-L
- Connectivity:2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required
- Unlock methods:PIN code, fingerprint, app, voice assistant
- Fingerprint unlock speed:0.3 seconds
- Auto-lock setting:0–180 seconds; off by default
- Battery life:Up to 6 months
- Compatible door thickness:1-3/8 to 1-3/4 inches (38–50 mm)
- Wi-Fi range guidance:Keep within 33 feet (10 m) of the router
Our verdict“Pick the Philips 4200 if you want a Wi-Fi-connected deadbolt and matching handle with app-managed entry, and your door and router placement fit its requirements.”
Evanshow Smart Fingerprint Door Lock with Lever Handle
The Evanshow’s clearest advantage is its wide stated door-thickness range: it fits wooden doors from 1.18 to 1.97 inches, broader than the Philips 4200’s listed range. It also brings fingerprint, keypad, NFC card, and mechanical-key entry together with Tuya app tools for temporary access, entry logs, and silent mode. For renters or households that want a lever lock with automatic locking, those options cover more everyday situations than the keypad-only TEEHO TE001. There is an important setup caveat, though: an administrator fingerprint must be registered before first use, because any fingerprint can unlock the door until that step is complete. The USB port is for emergency external power, not charging the internal batteries. I’d favor a model with clearer remote-connectivity details if off-site control is a priority; this one makes more sense for local keyless access and app-managed codes.
Pros:- Supports fingerprint, keypad passcode, NFC card, and mechanical-key entry.
- Tuya app offers permanent and temporary access management, entry logs, and silent mode.
- Automatic locking reduces the chance of leaving the door unsecured.
- Reversible handle and broad stated wooden-door thickness range aid fit.
Cons:- Any fingerprint can unlock the door until an administrator fingerprint is registered.
- USB emergency power does not recharge the internal batteries.
- The supplied data does not specify Wi-Fi remote control.
Best for: Owners of wooden doors across a wider range of thicknesses who want fingerprint, NFC, keypad, and app-managed guest access in a lever lock.
Not ideal for: Buyers who need confirmed built-in Wi-Fi remote control, or who may not be able to register an administrator fingerprint during setup.
- Brand:Evanshow
- Model:190BT
- Handle type:Lever
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, keypad passcode, NFC card, mechanical key
- App management:Tuya app; permanent and temporary access, entry logs, silent mode
- Door compatibility:Wooden doors 1.18–1.97 inches thick
- Hand orientation:Reversible
- Installation:No drilling or wiring
- Emergency power:USB port for an external power bank; does not charge internal batteries
Our verdict“Choose the Evanshow for a wooden door that needs a broader thickness fit and varied local entry methods, but not as a first choice for confirmed Wi-Fi access away from home.”
TEEHO TE001 Keyless Entry Deadbolt with Keypad, Satin Nickel
The TEEHO TE001 is the straightforward choice for buyers who mainly want keypad entry and dependable guest-code control, rather than app connectivity or biometrics. It stores up to 20 user codes and adds a one-time code that deletes itself after use, a useful distinction for a visitor who should not retain access. Adjustable auto-lock and one-touch locking cover routine door use, while IP54 weather resistance suits an exposed entry better than the Evanshow’s listed wooden-door-only fit. Compared with the Yamiry, TEEHO gives up fingerprint and app-based management but avoids dependence on a gateway for its code-based operation. Its fit still needs checking: installation calls for a 2-1/8-inch door hole, and it must be reset before first use. I’d skip it if you want remote access, fingerprint entry, or a smaller existing bore hole.
Pros:- Stores up to 20 user codes and supports a one-time guest code that deletes after use.
- Adjustable auto-lock and one-touch locking support simple daily operation.
- IP54 weather resistance is suited to weather-exposed entry points.
- Includes two backup mechanical keys and a low-battery indicator.
Cons:- Does not list app, Wi-Fi, fingerprint, or voice-control entry.
- Requires a 2-1/8-inch door hole and is not compatible with 38 mm door holes.
- Four AA batteries are not included, and the lock must be reset before first use.
Best for: Households, landlords, and hosts who want a keypad deadbolt with many user codes and a disposable guest code, without app-based features.
Not ideal for: Buyers seeking fingerprint or remote app access, or anyone whose existing door hole is not 2-1/8 inches.
- Brand:TEEHO
- Model:TE001
- Finish:Satin nickel
- Access codes:20 user codes and one-time guest code
- Auto-lock delay:10–99 seconds; off by default
- Power:4 AA batteries, not included
- Battery life:Up to 365 days
- Weather resistance:IP54
- Door hole size:2-1/8 inches (54 mm)
Our verdict“Choose the TEEHO TE001 if a weather-resistant keypad and self-deleting guest code matter more than fingerprints or remote app control.”
eufy Security C220 Smart Lock with Fingerprint Entry
The eufy C220 earns the broadest recommendation here by pairing six entry methods with built-in Wi-Fi, so remote app control does not require a separate bridge. Fingerprint, keypad, physical key, Apple Watch, and voice control give different household members convenient ways in, while the included eight AA batteries and stated life of up to eight months make setup more complete than the Philips 4200, which ships without batteries. Compared with the Yamiry, the C220 has direct Wi-Fi rather than requiring a separately sold gateway for remote control; Yamiry, in turn, uses a handle design rather than a deadbolt. The C220’s tradeoffs are its eight-battery requirement and battery life that varies with use. Its no-drill installation applies to compatible standard deadbolts, so I would check the existing hardware before choosing it.
Pros:- Six entry methods include fingerprint, keypad, app, key, Apple Watch, and voice control.
- Built-in Wi-Fi enables remote control without a separate bridge.
- Includes eight AA batteries and lists up to eight months of battery life.
- BHMA Grade 3 certified with an IP53 water-resistance rating.
Cons:- Uses eight AA batteries, and actual battery life varies with usage.
- No-drill installation is limited to compatible standard deadbolts.
- It is a deadbolt, not a complete handle-set replacement like the Philips 4200.
Best for: Homeowners who want a deadbolt with remote Wi-Fi access, fingerprint entry, and several alternative credentials without adding a bridge.
Not ideal for: Buyers replacing a handle rather than a compatible deadbolt, or those who want to minimize battery count and replacement needs.
- Brand:eufy Security
- Model:T8506
- Lock type:Deadbolt
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, app, keypad, physical key, Apple Watch, voice control
- Connectivity:Built-in Wi-Fi
- Battery:8 AA batteries included
- Battery life:Up to 8 months
- Certification:BHMA Grade 3
- Water resistance:IP53
Our verdict“Pick the eufy C220 for broad keyless access and remote control without a bridge, provided your door has a compatible standard deadbolt.”
Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt Lock with Keypad and Fingerprint Entry
The Philips stands out for giving households several ways to get inside: fingerprint, passcode, app, voice control, or a physical key. Its built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi also supports remote access without a separate hub, while one-time and scheduled codes make it easier to grant temporary entry. Compared with the Schlage Encode, the Philips adds fingerprint access, which can save time for residents who do not want to enter a code; Schlage counters with an included physical key and batteries, while the Philips requires you to supply AA batteries. The Philips supports doors up to 2 inches thick, a broader upper limit than Schlage’s listed fit. Its tradeoffs are 2.4 GHz-only Wi-Fi and no included door sensor, so it cannot report door position through a sensor.
Pros:- Five entry methods, including fingerprint and a physical key
- Built-in Wi-Fi enables remote access without a separate hub
- Supports up to 100 custom codes, including one-time and scheduled codes
- Auto-lock and Away Mode add hands-off locking options
Cons:- AA alkaline batteries are not included
- Connects only to 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi
- No door sensor is included
Best for: Households with multiple residents or frequent visitors who want fingerprint entry, remote access, and scheduled guest codes without adding a hub
Not ideal for: Buyers whose router uses only 5 GHz Wi-Fi, or anyone who wants a door sensor included to track whether the door is open
- Model:DDL242X-1HW
- Unlock methods:App, passcode, fingerprint, physical key, Alexa, or Google Assistant
- Wi-Fi:Built-in 2.4 GHz; no hub required
- Maximum custom passcodes:100; supports one-time and scheduled codes
- Auto-lock delay:10–180 seconds
- Door thickness:1⅜–2 in (38–50 mm)
- Power:AA alkaline (LR6) batteries; not included
- Recommended router distance:Within 65 ft
Our verdict“Choose the Philips if fingerprint entry and flexible guest codes matter more to your household than included batteries or a door sensor.”
Schlage Encode Smart Wi-Fi Deadbolt with Century Trim, Matte Black
The Schlage Encode is a strong fit for buyers who want keypad entry and remote control in a familiar deadbolt format, without installing a separate hub. Its app provides lock history and customizable notifications, while the touchscreen, built-in alarm, and physical-key backup give it a more security-focused feature set than a basic keypad lock. Against the Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt, Schlage gives up fingerprint entry but includes four AA batteries and a physical key; the Philips offers more ways to unlock and supports doors up to 2 inches thick. The Schlage’s listed door range tops out at 1¾ inches, so checking door thickness matters. Installation needs only a screwdriver, but remote and voice features depend on Wi-Fi and app pairing, and its stated battery life of up to six months means periodic replacement.
Pros:- Built-in Wi-Fi allows remote control and monitoring without a hub
- Supports up to 100 access codes, lock history, and customizable notifications
- Includes a touchscreen keypad, built-in alarm, and physical-key backup
- Installs with a screwdriver and includes four AA batteries
Cons:- No fingerprint entry, unlike the Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt
- Listed fit is limited to doors 1⅜–1¾ inches thick
- Battery life is stated as up to six months, and remote or voice functions require Wi-Fi and app pairing
Best for: Homeowners who want remote lock control, access-code history, and notifications from a keypad deadbolt, and whose door is within the listed thickness range
Not ideal for: People who want fingerprint unlocking or have a door thicker than 1¾ inches; skip it if you do not want app pairing for remote features
- Model:BE489WBCEN622
- Finish and trim:Matte Black; Century
- Connectivity:Built-in Wi-Fi
- Access codes:Up to 100
- Voice assistants:Alexa and Google Home
- Door thickness:1⅜–1¾ in
- Backset:2⅜ in or 2¾ in
- Power and stated battery life:Four AA batteries included; up to six months with typical use
- Backup access and warranty:One physical key; limited lifetime mechanical and finish warranty, limited 3-year electronics warranty
Our verdict“Pick the Schlage Encode if you want a hub-free keypad deadbolt with remote activity tracking and your door fits its narrower thickness range.”
How We Picked
I ranked these locks around the job buyers are hiring them to do: make everyday entry possible without a physical key. I compared their access methods, including keypad, fingerprint, and app-based control, then weighed how those methods affect convenience for residents, guests, and households with different routines. I also considered whether each product is a deadbolt or a handle-and-lock combination, since those formats are not interchangeable for every door.
The order reflects the balance between accessible keyless entry, connectivity, and the practical scope of each lock, not a claim that every model suits every home. The Schlage Encode leads for its built-in Wi-Fi deadbolt approach; eufy follows for buyers who value fingerprint entry; and TEEHO is a more direct choice for keypad-first use. Philips offers options in both handle-and-deadbolt and connected deadbolt formats, while Yamiry and Evanshow serve buyers seeking fingerprint access in a lever-handle design. I also account for setup and fit: a lock with appealing features is a poor choice if its form does not match the door or the household’s needs.
| smart locks for keyless entry | Brand | Unlock methods |
|---|---|---|
| Yamiry Smart Door Handle Lock | Yamiry | Fingerprint, Bluetooth app, passcode, key fob, mechanical key, Alexa voice |
| Philips 4200 Series Wi-Fi Keyp | Philips | PIN code, fingerprint, app, voice assistant |
| Evanshow Smart Fingerprint Doo | Evanshow | Fingerprint, keypad passcode, NFC card, mechanical key |
| TEEHO TE001 Keyless Entry Dead | TEEHO | — |
| eufy Security C220 Smart Lock | eufy Security | Fingerprint, app, keypad, physical key, Apple Watch, voice control |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt L | — | App, passcode, fingerprint, physical key, Alexa, or Google Assistant |
| Schlage Encode Smart Wi-Fi Dea | — | — |
Factors to Consider When Choosing Smart Locks For Keyless Entry
Before choosing among keyless entry methods, start with the door and the people who use it. The right lock depends on how you want to enter, whether you need remote control, and what kind of hardware your door can accept. These checks can prevent a feature mismatch from turning into an installation or everyday-use problem.
Match the Lock Format to Your Existing Door
A deadbolt replacement and a lever-handle lock solve different hardware problems, even when both provide keyless entry. Check whether you are replacing only the deadbolt or need a lock and handle combination before comparing app features. Door thickness, bore-hole dimensions, backset, and the spacing between existing hardware can affect fit. Measure first and compare those dimensions with the manufacturer’s compatibility details rather than relying on a product photo. A handle-style lock may be a better match for a door without a separate deadbolt, while a deadbolt model may suit a standard deadbolt opening. If your door uses an unusual setup, favor a model with clear fit specifications and installation guidance.
Pick an Entry Method Your Household Will Actually Use
Keypads work well when several people need separate or shareable access codes, but they can be less convenient if entering a code each time feels tedious. Fingerprint readers can speed up access for regular users, though every household member must be able to use the reader reliably. App access is useful for managing a lock from a phone, but it should not be the only method a household can use comfortably. Consider children, visitors, caregivers, and anyone who may have difficulty with small buttons or biometric readers. A mixed-access model can offer more flexibility, but extra methods may add setup and maintenance. Choose around the least convenient user’s routine, not just the feature that sounds most advanced.
Decide Whether Remote Access Is Worth the Extra Complexity
Built-in Wi-Fi can let a lock communicate with an app without a separate bridge, but remote features depend on a working network and account setup. If you only need to enter at the door, a keypad-focused lock may cover the main need with fewer connected features. If you want to check or manage access while away, confirm exactly which functions the lock’s app supports and whether remote use needs an additional device or service. Do not assume that Bluetooth control from nearby means you can operate the lock from elsewhere. Connected access also makes battery upkeep and account security part of ownership. Decide which remote tasks you will use before paying attention to connectivity as a headline feature.
Plan for Access When Batteries or Electronics Need Attention
Keyless entry shifts routine access from a metal key to batteries, electronics, and sometimes a phone or network connection. Read the manufacturer’s battery guidance and low-battery warnings before installation, then make battery checks part of regular home upkeep. Find out what backup entry options are available if the batteries run down or a device stops responding. Keep the physical key or other supported backup method accessible outside the locked area when the model provides one. A smart lock should not leave the household without a workable entry plan during a power or connectivity issue. Buyers who want fewer connected dependencies may prefer a keypad-first design over relying heavily on app control.
Think Through Guest Access and Code Management
Access management matters most when a home has more than one regular user or receives visitors, cleaners, or short-term guests. Before buying, check whether the lock supports the kind of code creation and removal your routine requires; not every keypad model offers the same management tools. A temporary code can be more convenient than handing out a permanent household code, but only if the lock supports that workflow. App-managed access may make changes easier, though it can require every manager to use the same platform or account structure. Avoid sharing one code indefinitely when access needs change. The simplest system is often the one that makes it easy to revoke access without disrupting everyone else.
Balance Feature Count Against Everyday Reliability
More entry methods can make a lock flexible, but each one adds another feature to configure and maintain. A fingerprint reader is useful only if it recognizes the people who rely on it, and Wi-Fi adds value only if remote control is part of your routine. For a household that mainly wants to stop carrying keys, a dependable keypad may be a better fit than a device packed with unused functions. Compare the lock’s physical format, backup access, and setup demands alongside its feature list. Also check whether the design suits the door’s exposure and the manufacturer’s stated installation conditions. Paying for a more connected model makes sense when its added access tools solve a real problem for your household.
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I choose a keypad lock or a fingerprint lock for a household with several people?
A keypad can be easier to share across a household because users can enter a code without enrolling a biometric profile. Fingerprint entry can be quicker for regular users, but it may need individual setup and may not work equally well for everyone. Think about visitors and occasional users, too: a temporary code may be easier to manage than asking them to register a fingerprint. If you want both options, compare how the specific lock handles enrollment and code management rather than assuming all models work alike. The best fit is the method every regular user can use reliably.
Do I need Wi-Fi for keyless entry to work?
No. A keypad or fingerprint reader can provide keyless entry at the door without remote Wi-Fi control. Wi-Fi is mainly useful if you want app-based functions while away from home, and the exact functions vary by lock. Some nearby phone controls may use a different connection and should not be confused with remote access. If your main goal is leaving keys behind, prioritize the lock’s local entry methods and backup plan before choosing a connected model. That can keep setup simpler when remote management is not part of your routine.
Can I replace a lever-handle lock with a smart deadbolt, or the other way around?
Not automatically: a lever-handle lock and a deadbolt occupy different hardware positions and may require different door preparations. A deadbolt model generally replaces a deadbolt, while a handle-and-lock design may be intended for a different opening or hardware arrangement. Measure the door and check the lock’s specified dimensions, including bore holes and backset, before ordering. Also consider whether the door needs a separate latch or handle after the swap. If the existing setup does not match the product’s installation requirements, choose another format or seek qualified help.
What should I do if the lock’s battery dies or the app cannot connect?
Plan for this before installation by checking the product’s supported backup entry method and following its battery warning guidance. Keep any physical backup key in a location you can reach without being locked inside or outside the home. If the app cannot connect, a keypad or fingerprint method may still work locally, depending on the lock and the issue. Do not assume that Wi-Fi loss disables every feature, or that every model has the same backup behavior. Read the model’s instructions and make sure the household knows the fallback procedure.
Is a more connected smart lock worth choosing if I only want to stop carrying keys?
It may not be. If all you need is entry at the door without a key, a keypad-focused model can address that goal without making remote app features a priority. A connected lock makes more sense when you expect to manage access from away, check lock status, or use other app functions the model specifically supports. Extra connectivity can bring account setup, network dependence, and battery management into the decision. Compare the features you will use weekly with the setup and upkeep they require. Paying attention to that balance can point you toward a simpler lock that better fits your routine.
Conclusion
For most buyers seeking a connected deadbolt, I recommend the Schlage Encode as the best overall choice in this lineup; its deadbolt-only format is the main fit limitation. The TEEHO TE001 is my best value-style pick for buyers who want straightforward keypad entry without making Wi-Fi or fingerprint access central. For a premium-feature preference, the Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt is the option to examine for its combination of Wi-Fi, keypad, and fingerprint entry, while the eufy Security C220 is a strong specific pick for shoppers who prioritize fingerprint access. Beginners who want a simpler entry method should start with TEEHO, and buyers replacing a handle as well as a lock should compare the Philips 4200 Series with the Yamiry and Evanshow lever-handle models. My final check would be door compatibility: the best feature set only helps if the lock fits the hardware you have.
Fall Picks
fall essentials
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
